From Fragmented Continuity to Connected Risk and Resilience

Executive Summary

Executive Summary

Risk and resilience have become inseparable business requirements that must be demonstrated through operational readiness, not documented periodically in static plans. Organizations face an environment in which cyber incidents, digital dependency, third-party concentration, geopolitical volatility, infrastructure failure, workforce constraints, extreme weather, and regulatory change can disrupt critical operations with little warning and cascade rapidly across processes, technology, suppliers, locations, people, and jurisdictions. Yet many organizations still manage business impact analysis, continuity planning, crisis response, emergency communications, incident management, testing, and risk through fragmented spreadsheets, shared drives, documents, email, phone trees, and disconnected applications. This creates a widening gap between having continuity documentation and being genuinely prepared to sustain critical operations when normal assumptions fail. Organizations need a more connected operating model for risk and resilience: one that links critical operations and business processes to their dependencies, risks, controls, impact tolerances, recovery requirements, response plans, communications, incidents, exercises, and improvement actions, transforming resilience from a collection of documents into a continuous discipline of preparedness, execution, recovery, and learning.

GRC 20/20 evaluated Battleground as a practitioner-built risk and resilience platform that enables organizations to move beyond fragmented continuity processes toward a connected, operationally grounded model of readiness and response. Through solution briefings, strategy discussions, supporting materials, and client reference calls across financial services, hospitality and entertainment, and energy environments, GRC 20/20 found that Battleground provides the business-process and dependency architecture, guided business impact analysis, direct BIA-to-BCP plan generation, crisis and incident activation, emergency communications, mobile access, simulations, risk and control management, reporting, and practitioner support required to operationalize resilience across the organization. Battleground’s ability to connect critical operations with technology, suppliers, people, locations, risks, controls, tolerances, plans, incidents, actions, and response requirements positions it as more than a business continuity planning tool. GRC 20/20’s analysis concludes that Battleground enables organizations to make resilience executable by embedding preparedness, dependency awareness, response coordination, communications, testing, and continuous improvement into day-to-day operations, improving efficiency through reduced administrative effort, effectiveness through greater consistency and accountability, resilience through stronger preparedness and response, and agility through better visibility into dependencies and the ability to adapt plans as operating conditions change.

Have a question about Battleground or other solutions for risk and resilience management available in the market?