Description
ACL Interpretive Visual Remediation
Innovation in Internal Control Management
[tabs style=”default”] [tab title=”Executive Summary”]
The goal is to provide 360° GRC contextual awareness in intelligence and analytics while operationalizing GRC processes in the follow-through. Delivery of GRC contextual awareness requires that GRC be a central nervous system to capture signals found in processes, data, and transactions as well as changing risks and regulations for interpretation, analysis, and holistic awareness of risk in the context of business. But GRC reporting without follow-through does not help the organization; it needs to be operationalized. Organizations need an intuitive approach to integrating GRC analytics and reporting into further GRC processes to investigate, analyze, and remediate, providing an integrated view of GRC data that is a cohesive part of GRC processes in the organization. ACL Interpretive Visual Remediation is a GRC innovation that GRC 20/20 has researched to determine its value with organizations in dynamic business environments. GRC 20/20 has evaluated and verified the innovation found in Interpretive Visual Remediation and determines that it is beneficial in customer environments that rely heavily on data analytics for continuous control monitoring where the users need to streamline their ability to process, visualize, interpret, and remediate data analysis test exceptions. With an integrated view of data visualization and process, Interpretive Visual Remediation makes organizations more efficient, effective, and agile. In this context, GRC 20/20 has recognized ACL Interpretive Visual Remediation with a 2015 GRC Innovation Award for technical innovation in Internal Control Management.
[/tab] [tab title=”Table of Contents”]
- Reconciling Agility in GRC Processes & Data
- ACL Interpretive Visual Remediation
- Innovation in Internal Control Management
- What the Interpretive Visual Remediation Innovation Is About
- How is the Interpretive Visual Remediation Innovation Different?
- Benefits of Interpretive Visual Remediation
- Considerations in Context of Interpretive Visual Remediation
- About GRC 20/20 Research, LLC
- Research Methodology
[/tab] [tab title=”Author”]
Michael Rasmussen – The GRC Pundit @ GRC 20/20 Research, Michael Rasmussen is an internationally recognized pundit on governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) – with specific expertise on the topics of GRC strategy, process, information, and technology architectures and solutions. With 23+ years of experience, Michael helps organizations improve GRC processes, design and implement GRC architectures, and select solutions that are effective, efficient, and agile. He is a sought-after keynote speaker, author, and advisor and is noted as the “Father of GRC” — being the first to define and model the GRC market in February 2002 while at Forrester Research, Inc.
[/tab] [/tabs]
©GRC 20/20 Research, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, adapted, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of GRC 20/20 Research, LLC. If you are authorized to access this publication, your use of it is subject to the Usage Guidelines established in client contract. The information contained in this publication is believed to be accurate and has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed and is subject to change. GRC 20/20 accepts no liability whatever for actions taken based on information that may subsequently prove to be incorrect or errors in analysis. This research contains opinions of GRC 20/20 analysts and should not be construed as statements of fact. GRC 20/20 disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in such information. Although GRC 20/20 may include a discussion of related legal issues, GRC 20/20 does not provide legal advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such.
